This market was automatically settled Nov 6, 2026, 11:08 PM UTC
Will the Bundestag adopt the K.-o.-Tropfen Criminal Code bill (Drs 21/7560) on Nov 6 with Die Linke voting in favor?
Settled MarketMarket Settled
This market has been resolved.
You did not have a position in this market.
Final Outcome
Market Probability Chart
My Position
No positions are open on this market.
Trade History
0 tradesMarket Stats
AI Settlement
Yes
<think> Okay, let's tackle this. The market question is whether the Bundestag will adopt the specific criminal code bill on November 6th with Die Linke voting in favor. First, looking at the resolution criteria. The Yes answer requires adoption in second and third reading during a plenary vote after market close (05:00 UTC) but before the end of the day CET (22:59:59Z in UTC, since CET is UTC+1). Also, Die Linke must have voted in favor in the record. Resolver 1 claims the bill was adopted with Die Linke voting for. Their source is the Bundestag Textarchiv article from 6th November. They mention that the article states the bill was adopted with the votes of CDU/CSU, SPD, B90/Greens, and Die Linke. That directly addresses part of the criteria about the voting groups. The time of the vote was between 09:00 and 10:10 local time (CET), which converts to 08:00-09:10 UTC. Since market close was 05:00 UTC, that's after it. The UTC time of the vote ends before the deadline for the same day in CET (which is 22:59:59Z in UTC as per the criteria). So the timing checks out. The official record from Textarchiv specifies Die Linke's support, which meets the voting condition for "Yes." Resolver 2 reinforces this with similar sources. They point to the same Textarchiv article and the mediathek video where the bill was in second and third reading. They confirm the bill was adopted ("in Schlussabst angenommen") during the correct timeframe (09:00 local time, 08:00 UTC, which is after 05:00 UTC close). They also quote the same Textarchiv to confirm Die Linke's support. All the criteria are satisfied here as well. They cross-check the agenda and the timeline, which adds credibility. I should check if the sources are valid as per the resolution criteria. The resolution criteria mention that the Plenarprotokoll or the Textarchiv article are valid. Both resolvers used Textarchiv, which is a same-day readable source. Also, the Textarchiv explicitly states how each group voted, including Die Linke. The criteria note that if the sources don't state the group's vote, it resolves to No. Since both resolvers' evidence shows the vote for Die Linke, that's covered. No discrepancies between the resolvers. Both agree on the outcome and the sources used. The bill was adopted within the required window, and Die Linke's support is documented in the official record. Therefore, the answer should be 0. </think> ANSWER: Yes
Resolution criteria: - "Yes": Wins if the Bundestag adopts, in second and third reading, the government bill "Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Änderung des Strafgesetzbuches - Stärkung des strafrechtlichen Schutzes vor sogenannten K.-o.-Tropfen" (Drucksache 21/7560) in a plenary vote held strictly after 2026-11-06T05:00:00Z and at or before 2026-11-06T22:59:59Z (end of November 6, 2026, Central European Time), and the Bundestag's record of that vote states that the Die Linke (Left Party) parliamentary group (Die Linke) voted in favor. - "No": Wins if the bill is not adopted in that period (removed from the agenda, postponed, referred back to committee or rejected), or if the record states that the Die Linke (Left Party) group voted against, abstained, or was split. Clarifications: - The record is the Plenarprotokoll of the 106th session (https://dserver.bundestag.de/btp/21/21106.pdf, usually online two to three days after the session) or, as a same-day readable source, the bundestag.de Textarchiv article for the item, which after the vote states which groups voted for, against or abstained (for example "Dafür stimmten CDU/CSU, SPD und Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, dagegen die AfD-Fraktion, während die Linksfraktion sich enthielt"). - If the sources do not state how the named group voted, the question resolves "No". A roll-call vote (namentliche Abstimmung) is read by the group's majority only if the record states the group's position. - The Tagesordnung (status 2 November 2026) lists the item as TOP 25 on Friday, November 6, 2026, planned for 2026-11-06T08:00:00Z to 2026-11-06T09:10:00Z (09:00 to 10:10 local); the published agenda can change until the session. - Only the vote on the bill in second and third reading counts; a vote on a motion on the same agenda item does not. - The bill adds dangerous "Mittel" (means) next to weapons and dangerous tools in Sections 177(8) no. 1 and 250(2) no. 1 of the Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch).
Creator Stats
Less than 5 total markets created
